This confusion has provided the advocates of collective action and the defenders of unilateral action with parallel arguments that each group is now using against the other.

8.5 The same applied in relation to the argument that actions are pending in the Federal Court and in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

It mentions that the applicant expressly acknowledges that domestic remedies were not exhausted, since the application for judicial protection was submitted after the deadline, and seeks to justify his actions with three arguments:

In the plan of action, the argument put forward for this change is that most of the core United Nations departments and agencies are headquartered in New York, and the Executive Committees and subsidiary bodies convene in New York, as do the Security Council, the General Assembly and the Economic and Social Council.

In the plan of action, the argument put forward for this change is that most of the core United Nations departments and agencies are headquartered in New York, and the Executive Committees and subsidiary bodies convene in New York, as do the Security Council, the General Assembly and the Economic and Social Council.

It was a matter of great concern to him that Security Council resolution 1373 (2001) had been used as an argument for action that ran counter to the Charter, but nowhere did that resolution allow human rights derogations.

While mindful of the need to examine whether the judicial remedies in question were available and effective in practical terms, the Committee had insufficient information before it in terms of the numbers of actions brought, the arguments invoked and their outcomes to conclude that the judicial remedies invoked by the State party were ineffective.

His speech was a good example of the hubris of Al-Qaida's leaders and their self-perception as defenders of values such as freedom, equality, humanity and justice; nonetheless, it will have impressed Bin Laden's supporters as a sincere, reasonable and well-based argument for action.

The precautionary approach provides a strong argument for action to be taken to ensure the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity in marine areas beyond national jurisdiction, even though the currently existing data on such biodiversity is patchy and uneven in nature.

The argument that action in the CD is blocked by the rule of consensus which empowers a small number of States, enabling them to peddle disagreements over the scope and purpose of the treaty and its putative linkages to other issues, is not tenable.