Suppose we're given a computer with a 16-bit virtual address and a page size of 256 bytes.

However, the fact that most BITs address basically the same issues does not mean that they have the same underlying rationale, that all agreements provide the same degree of investment protection or that they have evolved following a homogeneous pattern over the last decade.

Do the objectives, format, scope and substantive content of BITs adequately address key concerns of host and home countries in the area of foreign investment? What additional provisions would make investors more comfortable about undertaking investments?

What are the similarities, differences and trends in bilateral treaties other than BITs in terms of addressing investment issues?

Now, let's let that hang there a little bit... ...and then we'll address that when we thought things through, okay?

In addition, BITs and RIAs addressed issues related to repatriation of funds, and matters related to settlement of disputes between States. Investor-State dispute settlement was also addressed.

Pin in, there you go. Now, let's let that hang there a little bit... ...and then we'll address that when we thought things through, okay?

What can be done to enhance the development potential of BITs, other bilateral treaties addressing investment issues and RIAs? Do home country measures and investor obligations need to be addressed?